Most women would be incels if they were men

An unnecessarily complicated but totally necessary analogy for female delusion

If I was some Aella type person, I would conduct the following experiment

In part one of the experiment, I would gather a sample of women and give them a questionnaire with something like the following questions:

1. What are your thoughts about men?

2. Do you like men in general?

3. How attractive do you think the average man is?

4. Do you think misandry, the discrimination of men, exists?

5. What percentage of men do you think are good enough for you?

6. What additional thoughts and opinions do you have about men?

I would then gather the results, but alter the gender so that the questions appeared as though they were responses from men about women. For example:

1. What are your thoughts about women?

2. Do you like women in general?

3. How attractive do you think the average woman is?

Etc…

In part two of the experiment, I would provide the altered survey responses to a separate group of women, telling them it's from a group of men giving their thoughts about women. I would then ask this second group of women what they think about these responses.

I have a strong intuition that the second group of women would find the first group of “men” to be conceited and delusional.

Moreover, this experiment would reveal something that many men intuitively understand: if you cut the typical attitudes that many women hold, and pasted them into the bodies of men, they would be the very sort of men they detest.

I originally got this idea when I went to a party a little while ago

The TV at the back of the condo was blasting some music by the rapper Future. At the beginning of the music video, Future walks into this therapy room and has a conversation with the manosphere guy Kevin Samuels – the first time I had ever heard of the guy.

Another girl happened to be watching the TV, and so she started loudly explaining how Kevin Samuels is a dirtbag, before talking about her laundry list of requirements that every girl should have in order to secure a “high value man.”

Curious, I started asking her a bunch of questions. “Would you date someone who makes around $40,000 a year? Would you date someone who doesn’t really have that many hobbies? Would you date someone who is a little bit out of shape, but otherwise average looking?”

Honestly I thought my questions were a little bit on the nose, because I figured any moment she would realize that I’m literally just describing her back to herself.

But no, completely oblivious, she confidently said that she would reject any man who had those attributes. So in other words, she would reject the male version of herself.

Now at this point, I wish I could tell you that I hit her with a gotcha moment, and everyone within earshot went: “Oooooooh.”

But in reality, OWNING WOMEN with FACTS and LOGIC has diminishing returns in the real world. It’s also the perfect way to never get invited back at parties. So I did the normie thing and moved onto another subject.

Nevertheless, I saw this phenomenon repeatedly over the next several months.

I kept noticing that the average woman had disdain for the average man. Moreover, if you had a Freaky Friday style body switch, where these ladies were swapped into a male version of themselves, they would be the very type of man they would laugh at, or otherwise reject.

So naturally I found myself asking the question…

What was happening here?

As with most things in life, we can explain this phenomenon using AI. Look at this graph:

This graph is a diagrammatic representation of the “actor/critic” model in reinforcement learning.

Don’t worry, I'm fully aware that nobody comes to Substack in order to learn things or become a better person. The main goal of this platform is to get gardening tips and promote fascism. As such, I won’t be diving into any technical detail.

The diagram is just a nifty little visual for how a robot learns whenever there’s an open environment. The main thing to note are these two red boxes, known as neural networks.

The top neural network is known as the actor, because it’s the one that tells the robot to take actions in the real world. For the sake of this analogy, let’s call that network “Joey.”

Joey makes a decision based on his current state, and gets feedback from the environment. This feedback then passes into the second neural network at the bottom of the diagram, which we will call “Monica”, because this network is a critic.

Monica evaluates Joey’s actions, then passes this feedback along to Joey. Joey updates his policy (otherwise known as strategy) allowing the robot to take a different action in the future.

(There’s also a whole bunch of math and shit, but math is gay and we’re all homophobes).

So naturally, this brings us back to delusional women

For women, especially younger women in the dating scene, this feedback model is completely dysfunctional.

Let’s start with the actor part. In order to get feedback, a person needs to take action. When it comes to the beginnings of most relationships, however, it's still widely regarded that the man has to make the opening moves.

The man, therefore, has to interact with a bunch of different environments (women) and receive some units of reward/penalty (rejection). Considering men have to swipe hundreds, if not thousands of times in order to get matches, the majority of them have to make some sort of update based on the feedback they get.

Which brings us to the other neural network — the critic. Men tend to be more solution oriented around where they stand; if they don't have a realistic expectation of their own attractiveness, then they simply won't get laid.

Women, by contrast, don’t use convolutional neural networks, but they do have a convoluted network of women — specifically, a network of women who are constantly boosting one another, telling each other that they can’t possibly have done anything wrong. The reason why they're struggling to find a relationship cannot possibly be something about themselves; it has to be the world that's mistaken.

So when you combine both of these pieces for women…

• A broken actor network that doesn’t know how to update it’s strategy, because they never have to make the first move or develop any sort of game

• A broken critic network that fails to accurately assess value based on their current state, because all of their girlies are boosting them

…You get a completely broken reinforcement loop, and delusion all around.

This is bad for women as well

According to the world economic forum, women in lower economic/education brackets are increasingly having trouble finding someone to settle down with.

Part of it is just because some women have to pick between a guy who’s been to jail three times, and a guy who has no teeth. But another part of it is that a lot of them simply don’t have a realistic expectation of what type of partner they can get in the first place.

The water level is rising, so to speak, with more and more unattractive women having less and less of an understanding of how unattractive they are.

I've mentioned it before, but the average woman is 5 foot 4 inches, 170 lbs. So unless they’re planning on fighting in the welterweight division in the UFC, they should probably worry about beating their cholesterol before beating the patriarchy.

But if they fix this reinforcement loop, then the actor part of their brain will be able to update their strategy, and the critic part of their brain will start accurately assessing how much value they bring to the table. It’s like the cosmic equivalent of post nut clarity.

But that's not going to happen any time soon. The problem is no one is giving them realistic feedback, and so they become increasingly bitter at men.

And if they were men, they would be incels.